Hate the Sin, Not the Book
“This is an intresting read. the stand out is the fact that Douglas tried to find the positive even with a history he disagreed with. This is the idea we were talking about last sunday”
Reading works from the past can offer perspective—even when they say things we don’t want to hear.
SEPTEMBER 6, 2020
Professor of humanities at Baylor University
This might seem a very strange time to publish a book recommending that we read the voices from the past. After all, isn’t the present hammering at our door rather violently? There’s a worldwide pandemic; a presidential election is about to consume the attention of America; and if all that weren’t sufficient, we are entering hurricane season. The present is keeping us plenty busy. Who has time for the past?
But my argument is that this is precisely the kind of moment when we need to take some time to step back from the fire hose of alarming news. (When I first tried to type fire hose, I accidentally typed dire hose instead. Indeed.) As we try to manage our dispositions, we need two things. First, we need perspective; second, we need tranquility. And it’s voices from the past that can give us both—even when they say things we don’t want to hear, and when those voices belong to people who have done bad things. One of the best guides I know to such an encounter with the past is Frederick Douglass, an escaped slave, America’s most passionately eloquent advocate for the abolition of slavery.
The Rest at
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/09/hate-sinner-not-book/616066